District Court Cases in Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 818,009
Simpson v. Capital One N.A. et al
as 6:2025cv00257
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
FOGLE v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00782
Plaintiff:
VANESSA FOGLE
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC, PHARMACIA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TURNER v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2025cv00783
Plaintiff:
LYNN TURNER
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY, LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WINTERMANN v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00786
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN WINTERMANN
Defendant:
PFIZER INC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NAVARRO-JUSINO v. WARDEN FPC PENSACOLA
as 3:2025cv00781
Petitioner:
IVAN T NAVARRO-JUSINO
Respondent:
WARDEN FPC PENSACOLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANDERSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 5:2025cv00137
Petitioner:
SANDRA ANDERSON
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HESTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2025cv00153
Petitioner:
KEVIN KENYATTA HESTER
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GAPHOOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2025cv00136
Plaintiff:
DAVE GAPHOOR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CALHOUN CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEST v. BARBER et al
as 3:2025cv00784
Plaintiff:
REGINALD WEST
Defendant:
M BARBER, J RODRIGUEZ and M LAPAIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. DUDLEY et al
as 3:2025cv00785
Plaintiff:
KEITH BYRD
Defendant:
T DUDLEY, M MORGAN, J SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
