Teuma et al v. Collett, District Director USCIS, Baltimore District Office et al
Laressa Gaelle Teuma and Flavien Ituka Mokeyo |
Gregory Collett, District Director USCIS, Baltimore District Office, Elizabeth Grant, Angelica Alfonso-Royals, Secretary Kristi Noem, Kash Patel and Pamela Jo Bondi |
8:2025cv01780 |
June 5, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland |
Theodore D Chuang |
Other Immigration Actions |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1154 Immigration: Procedure for Granting Immigration Status |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Supplement to #1 Complaint,, filed by Flavien Ituka Mokeyo, Laressa Gaelle Teuma (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 9, EOIR Order on Motion to Dismiss)(Etokebe, Ntiense) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for mandamus aND FOR APPROPRIATE RELIEF against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-12022037.), filed by Flavien Ituka Mokeyo, Laressa Gaelle Teuma. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Coversheet, #2 Exhibit 1, Plaintiff Teuma's Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2, CBP Forn I-94, #4 Exhibit 3, Marriage Certificate, #5 Exhibit 4, Receipt Notice Forn I-130, #6 Exhibit 5, Receipt Notice Form I-485, #7 Exhibit 6, Interview Notice, #8 Exhibit 7, Approval Form I-130, #9 Exhibit 8, Notice of Termination of Asylum Status, #10 Exhibit 10, Online Case Status, #11 Exhibit 11, Online Processing Time, #12 Exhibit 12, USCIS Response to Service Request)(Etokebe, Ntiense) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.