Stancil v. King
Plaintiff: Jessica Nicole Stancil
Defendant: Michelle A King
Case Number: 6:2025cv03030
Filed: February 13, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: M Douglas Harpool
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 3/6/25 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
February 19, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Jeffrey P. Ray on behalf of Michelle A King (Attorney Jeffrey P. Ray added to party Michelle A King(pty:dft))(Ray, Jeffrey)
February 18, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Social Security Case. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has generated a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office of the case filing. No summons shall issue. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Hanna, Jaime)
February 14, 2025 Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Kelsey Young on behalf of Jessica Nicole Stancil. (Filing fee $405 receipt number IFP) filed byKelsey Young on behalf of Jessica Nicole Stancil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Kelsey)
February 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have 20 days to file the complaint.. Signed on 2/14/25 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Howard, Linda)
February 13, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT from Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts to District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. Judge Counts no longer assigned to this case. Please note the new case number: 25-3030-CV-S-MDH. (Melvin, Greg)
February 13, 2025 Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Kelsey Young on behalf of Jessica Nicole Stancil. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/27/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit complaint)(Attorney Kelsey Young added to party Jessica Nicole Stancil(pty:pla))(Young, Kelsey)
February 13, 2025 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to all parties: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 3/6/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Siegert, Karen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stancil v. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Nicole Stancil
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle A King
Represented By: Ssaogcomms Ssaogcomms
Represented By: Jeffrey P. Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?