Sanhueza Sepulveda vs Chestnut et al
| Nicolas Sanhueza Sepulveda |
| Christopher Chestnut, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, PAMELA JO BONDI, John/Jane Doe and John & Jane Does |
| 2:2025cv00985 |
| June 4, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Kristi Noem, Secretary DHS by Petitioner Nicolas Sanhueza Sepulveda. (Lui, T Laura) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Todd Lyons, Acting Director ERO by Petitioner Nicolas Sanhueza Sepulveda. (Lui, T Laura) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Christopher Chestnut, Warden NSDC by Petitioner Nicolas Sanhueza Sepulveda. (Lui, T Laura) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Pamela Jo Bondi, US Attorney General by Petitioner Nicolas Sanhueza Sepulveda. (Lui, T Laura) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued John/Jane Doe Las Vegas ERO Field Office Director by Petitioner Nicolas Sanhueza Sepulveda. (Lui, T Laura) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued John/Jane Doe HSI Special Agent in Charge by Petitioner Nicolas Sanhueza Sepulveda. (Lui, T Laura) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANVDC-8071531) by Nicolas Sanhueza Sepulveda. (Lui, T Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
