Piette v. King
| Bradley D Piette |
| Michelle A King |
| 1:2025cv00188 |
| February 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/20/2025. Current case deadlines STAYED and case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending filing of motion for substitution. Motion due by end of day 5/14/2025; failure to file by deadline will result in dismissal. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Filing 8 SUGGESTION OF DEATH Upon the Record as to Bradley D. Piette by Bradley D Piette. (Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 7 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 4/11/2025;Plaintiff's brief due 5/12/2025;Defendant's response due 6/11/2025;Plaintiff's reply due 6/25/2025. (cc: all counsel) (cb) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Michelle A King. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/7/2025 GRANTING #3 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Notice of Service - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has electronically notified via CM/ECF the Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. (edr) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Bradley D Piette. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Bradley D Piette. (Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Bradley D Piette. (Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Bradley D Piette (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appeals Council denial, #3 ALJ decision)(Chewning, Donald) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (mew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Piette v. King | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bradley D Piette | |
| Represented By: | Donald J Chewning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michelle A King | |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | SSA - Office of the General Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
