Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Carucci v. King
as 7:2025cv01415
Plaintiff:
Savanna Rosa Carucci
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. King
as 3:2025cv00176
Plaintiff:
Keyona L. Adams
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Flores v. King
as 4:2025cv00683
Plaintiff:
Rodney Paul Flores, Sr.
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Steagall v. King
as 1:2025cv20717
Plaintiff:
David Bruce Steagall
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Atchley v. King
as 2:2025cv00009
Plaintiff:
Richard Dale Atchley
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SNYDER v. KING
as 2:2025cv00217
Plaintiff:
Philip P. Snyder
Defendant:
MICHELLE A. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gonzales v. King
as 3:2025cv05010
Plaintiff:
Nicole E. Gonzales
Defendant:
Michelle A King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rojas v. King
as 1:2025cv01318
Plaintiff:
William Rojas
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
ROBERTS v. KING
as 1:2025cv00104
Plaintiff:
MARK ROBERTS
Defendant:
MICHELLE A. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shick v. King
as 4:2025cv00099
Plaintiff:
Maryanne M Shick
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
