District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 118,400
Celina Mutual Insurance Company v. GAMEZ ROQUE et al
as 1:2025cv00314
Plaintiff:
Celina Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
SARA M. GAMEZ ROQUE, MAGRO MACIAS ORTIZ, ROSALBA BELTRAN BELLO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ABEL DOMINGUEZ SALAZAR, DECEASED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Doughty v. Warden
as 1:2025cv00317
Petitioner:
Antonio Doughty and Antonio S. Doughty
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Hershburger et al
as 1:2025cv00315
Plaintiff:
JoDevel Jason Hill
Defendant:
Troy Hershburger and Chantel Sphor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blessing v. Walker et al
as 1:2025cv00316
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Andrew Blessing
Defendant:
Brian Walker and Nickolas Knatel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Webb et al
as 2:2025cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jason Wade
Defendant:
Jeffrey Webb, Conner Lefever, Gabrielle Rude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
