U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,457
Ontiveros v. Bisignano
as 2:2025cv00205
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ontiveros
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Niczyporuk v. Todd
as 2:2024cv00391
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (District or BAP)
Dana et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 2:2025cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tami Dana and Robert Dana
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03085
Plaintiff:
Martin Silva Mendoza
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Penny v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03086
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lee Penny
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America et al v. Omnicell Inc
as 2:2023cv00240
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act - Liability
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Sunde et al
as 2:2025cv00200
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Leif Sunde, Christopher Stein and Malinda Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Fields v. McCroskey et al
as 2:2025cv00201
Plaintiff:
Catheryn Fields
Defendant:
Robin McCroskey, Barrett Scudder, Pend Orielle County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv05066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
