U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 61 - 70 of 16,460
Stanley v. Bisignano
as 2:2025cv00168
Plaintiff:
Melissa Grace Stanley
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Day v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03067
Plaintiff:
Jessica Day
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Romero v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03068
Plaintiff:
Felix Romero
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vandaveer v. Bisignano
as 2:2025cv00167
Plaintiff:
Felicia Vandaveer
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kern v United States of America
as 4:2025cv05062
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Rex Michael Kern, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Arrowood v. Bisignano
as 4:2025cv05060
Plaintiff:
Aspen Arrowood
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Herrera v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03069
Plaintiff:
Fernando Javier Herrera
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schier v. Anderton et al
as 1:2025cv03070
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Schier
Defendant:
Matthew J Anderton, Tracy Larsen and Deputy Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Soto v. Bisignano
as 2:2025cv00165
Plaintiff:
Luis R Soto
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
